Main Menu

Anwyn

Novus 2nd Edition

Novus 1st Edition

« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: Renaming Universal Spells?  (Read 1909 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

imported_Rasyr

  • Guest
Renaming Universal Spells?
« on: April 21, 2011, 10:58:20 PM »
Considering how all of the other Schools of Magic are named, continuing to call them "Universal Spells" seems a bit awkward to me.

How would you feel if I renamed them to "Cantrips". They are the same thing, but Cantrips are what ALL who learn magic can use (even those who are not associated with a given School of Magic).

Thoughts? Opinions?
Logged

Offline Right Wing Wacko

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 0
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Renaming Universal Spells?
« Reply #1 on: April 22, 2011, 12:32:15 AM »
I dunno...
"Cantrip" seems/sounds... well, weak.Hmmm.... I guess "cantrips" would do if nothing better comes along...
Logged

Offline capmarvel

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 0
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Renaming Universal Spells?
« Reply #2 on: April 22, 2011, 01:25:54 AM »
How about:

low magic

base magic

prime magic
Logged

Offline samwise7

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Renaming Universal Spells?
« Reply #3 on: April 22, 2011, 02:46:12 AM »
Yeah, Cantrips sounds like zero level spells, I'd use something different.
Logged

imported_Rasyr

  • Guest
Renaming Universal Spells?
« Reply #4 on: April 22, 2011, 02:51:04 AM »
The spells aren't zero level, but they are the easiest to learn, so easy that every school, and even non-spell users can learn them. So, they are part of each school, yet also part of none as well...

Cantrips isn't a perfect name, but so far, nothing else is either...
Logged

Offline Right Wing Wacko

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 0
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Renaming Universal Spells?
« Reply #5 on: April 22, 2011, 03:04:18 AM »
"Common"
"Inborn"
"Mundane"
"Collective"
"Conventional"
"Standard"

sigh
This is harder than it sounds!
Logged

Offline Fidoric

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 446
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Renaming Universal Spells?
« Reply #6 on: April 22, 2011, 04:37:55 PM »
What about :
- basic spells,
- common spells,
- first grade spells,
- Vulgate (or any bad low latin translation),
- Prosaic.
Logged

Offline gamewizard

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 0
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Renaming Universal Spells?
« Reply #7 on: April 26, 2011, 05:49:10 AM »
So far I like "Prime" and "Prosaic", these sound the best to me.
Logged

imported_Witchking20k

  • Guest
Renaming Universal Spells?
« Reply #8 on: May 02, 2011, 05:21:14 PM »
Novice?
Logged

Offline Right Wing Wacko

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 0
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Renaming Universal Spells?
« Reply #9 on: May 03, 2011, 03:01:31 AM »
I like "Mundane" the best, but "Common" and maybe even "Standard" aren't too bad.
Logged

Ashtara

  • Guest
Renaming Universal Spells?
« Reply #10 on: May 03, 2011, 09:29:13 PM »
I like Universal Spells...it tells us exactly what they are. Spells that anybody can get regardless of class. Universal across the board. Cantrips would work as well as that implies that they are the easier and cheaper spells that anybody can get access to. I don't understand where Prime or Prosaic comes from or how those words apply to these spells.

They are just Spells that anybody can get and have no School or Class associations.
Logged

Offline windmark8040

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://www.obsidianportal.com/campaigns/lands-of-brixia
Renaming Universal Spells?
« Reply #11 on: May 13, 2011, 04:26:39 PM »
"Common" or "Mundane" seems like a good fit to describe the general means of accessing the spells. A Fighter with the ability to cast "Common" spells sounds right to me; both in flavor and function.
Logged

imported_Rasyr

  • Guest
Renaming Universal Spells?
« Reply #12 on: May 13, 2011, 05:00:15 PM »
how about "Neutral" Spells (i.e. as in they are neutral in relationship to the other schools of magic)?
Logged

Offline Right Wing Wacko

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 0
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Renaming Universal Spells?
« Reply #13 on: May 13, 2011, 06:12:55 PM »

how about "Neutral" Spells (i.e. as in they are neutral in relationship to the other schools of magic)?



I don't like it.
The name "Neutral" carries too much "alignment" baggage with it.
I would chose a different name... like "Common" or "Mundane"...
Logged

Offline Tywyll

  • FX Playtesters
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 31
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Renaming Universal Spells?
« Reply #14 on: May 14, 2011, 02:25:43 PM »
I like 'Low' Magic.  Or maybe even Hedge Magic.  I don't like Neutral Spells or Mundane (Common, etc) as magic shouldn't be mundane...
Logged
Pages: [1] 2
« previous next »